IFRS · IAS 19
IAS 19 Actuary in Switzerland
We value Swiss pension obligations under IAS 19 for groups reporting under IFRS — from setting the assumptions to an audit-ready actuarial report.
Why Swiss plans fall under IAS 19
Swiss pension plans are “defined contribution” in the language of the Swiss LPP/BVG. Under IAS 19, however, they qualify as defined benefit plans: guaranteed conversion rates, minimum interest on retirement savings and statutory benefits create obligations that go beyond a pure defined contribution promise.
Any Swiss listed company applying IFRS — and any Swiss subsidiary of an IFRS group — must therefore have its pension obligations valued by an actuary using the projected unit credit method.
Why a specialised IAS 19 actuary?
Valuing post-employment benefits under IAS 19 requires a dual skill set — actuarial and financial. Engaging a specialised actuary answers three imperatives.
Ensuring compliance
The standard imposes a specific, complex calculation method — projected unit credit — that cannot be improvised. Your auditors will almost always require these calculations to be performed and signed by a recognised actuary before certifying your IFRS accounts without qualification.
Controlling balance sheet volatility
Pension obligations are often among the largest liabilities on a company’s balance sheet. A small change in assumptions — discount rate, turnover — can move equity massively. An experienced actuary guides you towards realistic, stable assumptions, avoiding accounting surprises from one year to the next.
Turning technique into a management tool
We do not just deliver a number: we help finance and HR teams understand their cost structure (service cost, interest cost) and anticipate future impacts. The actuary bridges the complexity of Swiss pension plans and international accounting requirements.
How we calculate your defined benefit obligation (DBO)
The valuation follows the method required by the standard: projected unit credit. In certain cases a traditional unit credit (TUC) approach also applies. The calculation has three steps.
1. Projecting future benefits
Rather than simply reading today’s savings capital, we project what the employee will actually receive at retirement: estimated future salary — including inflation and individual increases — and the entitlements accrued at retirement age under the fund regulations.
2. Applying probabilities
The projected amount is then weighted with demographic assumptions: how likely is the employee to still be with the company at retirement? What are the risks of disability or death before retirement? What is their life expectancy?
3. Discounting
The final amount — payable in 10, 20 or 30 years — is brought back to today’s value using the discount rate, based on yields of high-quality (AA) corporate bonds. Our reference rates are published monthly.
The obligation is the present value of future benefits, in proportion to the years of service already rendered. It therefore does not equal the vested termination benefit — it is often higher. The same holds for the service cost recognised by the employer: spread linearly over the whole career, it does not equal the employer contributions paid.
The three steps, visualised
Illustrative — member aged 45, retirement at 65, projected benefit = 100. The DBO is neither the projected benefit nor the vested termination benefit.
A typical engagement
- Review of the pension fund regulations and the member data provided by the fund
- A documented assumptions proposal, supported by our annual study of around 210 client companies
- Calculation of the DBO, service cost and the P&L and OCI components
- A complete actuarial report: journal entries, ready-to-publish IAS 19 disclosures, reconciliations
- Direct coordination with your auditors and the group actuary
- Projection of next year’s pension cost and mid-year simulations
What the disclosure shows
Assumptions that stand up to audit
The discount rate is based on market yields of high-quality corporate bonds in Swiss francs; we publish our reference rates monthly. The other assumptions — interest credited on savings, salary increases, mortality on the latest BVG/LPP tables, turnover — are calibrated to your population and benchmarked against Swiss market practice.
Discount rate sensitivity
Illustrative — 15-year duration. Base: 15-year CHF AA rate, .
Frequently asked questions
Our Swiss plan is “defined contribution” — why is it defined benefit under IAS 19?
Because Swiss law prescribes guarantees — conversion rates, minimum interest, statutory benefits — that the employer economically bears. IAS 19 therefore classifies virtually all Swiss plans as defined benefit.
Which companies in Switzerland are concerned by IAS 19?
It is not the size of the company that decides, but the accounting framework of its financial statements:
- listed companies: Swiss companies reporting under the international standard on the SIX Swiss Exchange prepare their consolidated accounts under IFRS — IAS 19 is mandatory for them;
- subsidiaries of international groups — the most frequent case among our clients: even a modest Swiss SME must deliver an IAS 19 valuation every year if its foreign parent reports under IFRS;
- large private companies that voluntarily adopt IFRS — for international financing, transparency towards investors, or an upcoming sale or IPO.
Worth knowing: IAS 19 is particularly delicate to apply in Switzerland, because it must “translate” the specifics of the LPP/BVG second pillar — treated under IFRS as defined benefit, contrary to local perception.
How often is an IAS 19 actuarial valuation required?
The standard requires determining the present value of the obligations and the fair value of plan assets with sufficient regularity that the amounts recognised do not differ materially from those that would be determined at the reporting date — in practice, a full remeasurement every year.
During the year, a remeasurement is needed upon significant events — plan amendments, major workforce reductions, large interest-rate movements; otherwise roll-forwards are sufficient for quarterly closings.
Our approach: start these calculations in the fourth quarter — better budget planning, unhurried discussion of assumptions and methods, and pre-validation of these elements by your auditors. For US groups we also deliver US GAAP ASC 715 from the same data.
What data do we need to provide?
We split the data collection into two streams to keep your administrative burden as light as possible.
From you as the employer:
- validate with us the economic and demographic assumptions specific to your company — expected salary increases, staff turnover;
- provide the data on jubilee benefits: loyalty awards and similar service-related benefits.
From the pension funds, with a power of attorney from you, we collect directly:
- the individual data of active members (insured salaries, retirement savings, key dates) and of pensioners;
- the current fund regulations;
- the fund’s asset situation.
We then check the data for plausibility and consistency.
How do you set the discount rate?
From market yields of high-quality CHF corporate bonds with a duration matching that of your obligations. Our reference rates are updated monthly.
How does IAS 19 differ from US GAAP ASC 715?
Both treat Swiss plans as defined benefit, but they differ in how pension cost is presented and how gains and losses are recognised. We prepare valuations under both frameworks from the same data — see our ASC 715 page.
What are the main differences between IAS 19 and Swiss GAAP FER 16?
Both standards deal with occupational pensions, but their philosophy differs fundamentally — three breaking points:
- future obligations vs. snapshot view: IAS 19 takes a long-term economic view — the present value of all pensions and lump sums payable in 10, 20 or 30 years — which often creates a significant balance sheet liability. FER 16 relies on the pension fund’s situation at the closing date: for a defined contribution plan with no technical underfunding, the company generally recognises no obligation;
- the discount rate: IAS 19 requires the yield of high-quality (AA) corporate bonds, which fluctuates with the market — hence a volatile liability. FER 16 generally uses the fund’s technical interest rate, which is far more stable;
- recognition of surpluses: under IAS 19 it is rare — apart from employer contribution reserves — to recognise an asset when the fund is overfunded, and doing so is often unwise (high balance sheet volatility). FER 16 allows, under strict conditions, recognising part of a surplus intended to reduce future employer contributions.
IAS 19 is therefore generally more “pessimistic” than the Swiss standard: it brings onto the balance sheet a forward-looking economic perspective that Swiss standards — usually with good reason — leave off it. Much of this bias comes from the discount rate, well below the return expectations of pension institutions. FER 26, for its part, governs the accounts of the pension institution itself — we work under all three frameworks.
An independent actuary for your IFRS reporting
100 % owned by its active partners, with no ties to banks or insurers: our recommendations follow one logic only — yours.