US GAAP · ASC 715-30
ASC 715 Actuary in Switzerland
Swiss subsidiary of a US group? We value your Swiss pension obligations under ASC 715-30 and deliver the reporting package your parent company and its auditors expect.
A Swiss plan in US financial statements
The guarantees of the Swiss LPP/BVG make Swiss pension plans defined benefit under US GAAP as well. ASC 715-30 requires an actuarial valuation with rules of its own that differ from IAS 19: presentation of pension cost, expected return on plan assets, amortisation of actuarial gains and losses through AOCI (corridor method), prior service cost, settlements and curtailments.
We have prepared these valuations for many years for Swiss subsidiaries of US-listed groups — working directly with consolidation teams and group actuaries, in English.
What ASC 715 covers
ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits” brings together, in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the US GAAP rules on retirement benefits. For a Swiss subsidiary, three subtopics matter:
- ASC 715-30: defined benefit pension plans, and therefore your LPP/BVG plan — projected benefit obligation (PBO), net periodic benefit cost, actuarial gains and losses, settlements and curtailments;
- ASC 715-20: the disclosures required for all defined benefit plans;
- ASC 715-60: other postretirement benefits (OPEB), such as retiree medical cover or life insurance after retirement. Rare in Switzerland, they are measured on the same principles where they exist.
Defined contribution plans (ASC 715-70) and multiemployer plans (ASC 715-80) do not require an actuarial valuation. A Swiss LPP/BVG plan generally falls into neither category, even when the employer is affiliated with a collective foundation.
The impact of ASC 715 on your consolidated accounts
An ASC 715 valuation does more than translate Swiss figures into dollars: it redefines how pension obligations are accounted for, often diverging significantly from the Swiss statutory accounts. The impact shows at three levels.
Balance sheet: recognising the funded status
ASC 715 requires the company to recognise on its balance sheet the difference between the present value of the obligations (projected benefit obligation, PBO) and the fair value of plan assets. If the plan is underfunded, the company records a liability; if overfunded, an asset may be recognised.
Worth noting: even where a Swiss pension fund is healthy under the LPP/BVG (coverage ratio above 100 %), the ASC 715 calculation can reveal a liability on the employer’s balance sheet — mainly because of different discount rates, based on high-quality (AA) corporate bonds.
P&L: the net periodic benefit cost
The valuation determines the annual charge to be booked, the net periodic benefit cost — often different from the contributions actually paid to the pension fund. It includes:
- the cost of services rendered by employees during the year (service cost);
- the interest cost on the obligation;
- less the expected return on plan assets.
Equity: managing volatility through OCI
Actuarial gains and losses — a sudden move in interest rates, unexpected market performance — are generally not charged immediately to P&L: they flow through other comprehensive income (OCI). This smooths earnings, but directly affects the level of consolidated equity.
An ASC 715 valuation thus provides an economic, fair-value view of your pension obligations. Our aim: help you anticipate these impacts and avoid excessive volatility in your consolidated financial statements.
Discount rate sensitivity
Illustrative — 15-year duration. Base: 15-year CHF AA rate, .
A typical engagement
- Full ASC 715-30 valuation at your reporting date
- Switzerland-specific assumptions aligned with group policy: CHF discount rate, expected return, mortality
- Net periodic pension cost (NPPC) and US GAAP journal entries
- ASC 715-20 disclosures, ready for the reporting package
- Event calculations: settlements, curtailments, plan amendments
- Direct exchanges with the group actuary and auditors, within their deadlines
What the disclosure shows
The US GAAP year-end timetable
For a financial year ending on 31 December, as at many US groups, a typical timetable looks like this:
- September and October: data requests (employees and pension fund), preliminary assumptions discussed with the group actuary;
- November: preliminary results projected to 31 December, for the group’s budget and early reporting;
- First days of January: update with the year-end discount rate and plan assets, ASC 715-20 tables for the reporting package;
- January and February: questions from the group auditors, next year’s net periodic benefit cost for the quarterly closings.
Listed groups file their annual report (Form 10-K) with the SEC 60 to 90 days after year-end, depending on their size; their internal deadlines are shorter. We adapt this timetable to each engagement.
ASC 715 vs IAS 19: the differences for a Swiss plan
Both standards start from the same data and the same projected unit credit method. The results still diverge on several points:
- Return on plan assets: IAS 19 applies the discount rate to the net obligation (net interest). ASC 715 uses an expected long-term rate of return, specific to the plan’s asset allocation, applied to the fair value of plan assets or to a smoothed market-related value.
- Actuarial gains and losses: under IAS 19 they go immediately and permanently to OCI. Under ASC 715 they accumulate in AOCI; the portion above the corridor (10 % of the greater of the PBO and the value of plan assets) is amortised to profit or loss over the average remaining service period.
- Plan amendments: IAS 19 recognises past service cost immediately in profit or loss. ASC 715 records prior service cost in AOCI and amortises it over the remaining service period — for example after a reduction of the conversion rate.
- Asset ceiling: IAS 19 limits the net asset recognised (asset ceiling, IFRIC 14). ASC 715 has no ceiling: a surplus is recognised in full.
- Lump sums and vested benefits: under ASC 715, a lump sum paid at retirement or a vested termination benefit (Freizügigkeitsleistung) is generally a settlement; when their total for the year exceeds service cost plus interest cost, part of the amounts accumulated in AOCI is recognised in profit or loss. IAS 19 treats them as benefits paid under the terms of the plan.
- Presentation: since ASU 2017-07, only service cost is reported in operating income; the other components (interest cost, expected return, amortisation) are presented outside operating income.
IAS 19 and ASC 715 at the same time?
Many of our clients report under both frameworks — IFRS for a European sub-group, US GAAP for the American consolidation. We deliver both valuations from the same data, with a clear reconciliation of the differences. See also our IAS 19 actuary page.
Frequently asked questions
How does ASC 715 differ from IAS 19?
Both standards treat Swiss plans as defined benefit, but they diverge on the presentation of pension cost, the recognition of actuarial gains and losses (AOCI and corridor under US GAAP, OCI without recycling under IFRS), the expected return on plan assets and the treatment of plan amendments.
Why is our Swiss plan defined benefit under US GAAP?
Because Swiss law guarantees a conversion rate, minimum interest and statutory benefits — economic obligations of the employer. ASC 715 therefore requires a full actuarial valuation, as for a classic defined benefit plan.
Our group sets the assumptions — what latitude is left?
Financial assumptions must reflect the Swiss market: a discount rate based on high-quality CHF corporate bonds and Swiss mortality tables. We document these country-specific choices and align them with the group’s assumptions policy, so the file holds up with the auditors.
How often is an ASC 715 actuarial valuation required?
As a rule, a full valuation is performed every year at the fiscal year-end. Several situations change that rhythm:
- annual reporting: the closing requires a precise measurement of the PBO and of next year’s service cost;
- quarterly or half-year reporting: for listed companies or subsidiaries of large groups, simplified roll-forward estimates are often sufficient between two full studies;
- significant events (remeasurement): plan amendments, workforce reductions (curtailment) — a restructuring, or vested benefits paid out exceeding 10 % of plan assets or of the obligation —, settlements (e.g. a pensioner buy-out);
- market volatility: when rates or returns move sharply, more frequent simulations help anticipate the impact on equity (OCI).
Our approach: start the work a few months before year-end to validate the actuarial assumptions (discount rate, mortality tables…) with your auditors and avoid surprises at consolidation — and plan the data requests early; complete, consistent data can take time to obtain.
Do you also provide the disclosures?
Yes — the tables required by ASC 715-20, ready to drop in, together with reconciliations and supporting documentation for your auditors.
Our subsidiary is affiliated with a collective foundation — is an ASC 715 valuation needed?
As a rule, yes. In a Swiss collective foundation, the assets and obligations of each affiliated employer are tracked separately: the plan is then treated as a multiple-employer plan, measured as the employer’s own plan under ASC 715-30, and not as a multiemployer plan within the meaning of ASC 715-80. We document this analysis for your auditors.
What is the difference between the PBO and the ABO?
The projected benefit obligation (PBO) takes future salary increases into account; the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is based on current salaries. The balance sheet uses the PBO, but ASC 715-20 also requires the ABO of each pension plan to be disclosed.
See alsoIAS 19 actuaryIPSAS 39 actuaryAccredited pension fund expert
An independent actuary for your US GAAP reporting
100 % owned by its active partners, with no ties to banks or insurers. Offices in Baar and Lausanne, engagements across Switzerland.
